New Delhi | Observing that Justice Yashwant Varma's conduct does not inspire confidence, the Supreme Court on Wednesday posed sharp questions to the judge seeking invalidation of a report by an in-house inquiry panel which found him guilty of misconduct in the cash discovery row.
The top court asked Justice Varma why did he appear before the in-house inquiry committee and not challenge it then and there.
It told Justice Varma that he should have come earlier to the apex court against the in-house inquiry panel's report.
A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih said if the Chief Justice of India has material to believe that there is misconduct by a judge then he can inform the president and the prime minister.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Justice Varma, submitted that the in-house inquiry panel's recommendation for his removal is unconstitutional.
Sibal told the court that recommendation of proceedings for removal in this manner would set a dangerous precedent.
The hearing is underway.
You may also like
'Dead economies' vs 'dead hand': Medvedev trades Cold War insults to Trump's remark; US-Russia standoff heats up online
Wayne Rooney's damning criticism from Tom Brady in never-before-seen Birmingham footage
Karnataka Temple Town Under Fire As SIT Finds Human Bones Amid Social Media Claims Of Mass Murders
Boy, 5, begged 'mummy I can't breathe' before dying in 'catastrophic failure'
Western Sydney University To Open First India Campus In Greater Noida By 2026